Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm going to need some evidence that Kurzweil was wrong. AFAICT he was right in 80%+ of his predictions with several more on track.
 help



It’s linked in the article. The 85% accuracy is just shameless self promotion.

https://danluu.com/futurist-predictions/#:~:text=flowing%20i...


I'm going to need some evidence that Kurzweil was right in 80%+ of his predictions with several more on track.

I think you missed a "I won't respond further."

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...


What? no human in history has gotten anything 80% right. You're doing exactly what this piece complains about.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: