Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's because Panpsychism is silly.


I don't think it's any more silly than the alternatives.


You don't think it's sillier than "rocks don't have consciousness"?


Potential for consciousness. To have a working mind you need to have a way to gather, process and store information. In case of rocks it would be very empty, static, timeless experience.


If I believe that machines or neural networks can develop consciousness, then I also believe in some kind of substrate independence which presupposes some kind of panpyschism imho because as you say things would have a potential for consciousness, some more and some less.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: